[ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Chown
Tim.Chown at jisc.ac.uk
Thu Oct 3 17:11:02 CEST 2019
> On 3 Oct 2019, at 16:02, Jens Link <lists at quux.de> wrote: > > Tim Chown <Tim.Chown at jisc.ac.uk> writes: > >> (Surprised we’re having this conversation in 2019, as the final fumes of >> IPv4 address space disappear from Europe…) > > If you had told me 10 or even 5 years ago that I would be having the > conversation in 2019 I would have laughed at you. Now it's a very sad > situation. IPv4 has won. > > I had a discussion over lunch about v6 yesterday (which is part of the > reason I started this today) and all I heard "but that is different > then IPv4. I don't like this!" There will always be a legacy tail. The dinosaurs can wallow in their swamp. Those who deploy v6 will benefit from it. Others will feel the heat of not moving; here in the UK it’s Sky and BT who have between them ~10M households on IPv6. That’s not failure. New communities will benefit. For example, the largest science experiments are now migrating to IPv6, e.g., CERN and WLCG is 70% there, SKA will use it. Tim
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]