[ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Job Snijders
job at instituut.net
Thu Oct 3 14:03:24 CEST 2019
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 13:57 Jens Link <lists at quux.de> wrote: > Andreas Härpfer <ah at v6x.org> writes: > > >> On 3. Oct 2019, at 13:16, Antonio Prado via ipv6-wg <ipv6-wg at ripe.net> > wrote: > > > No worries, looking at the headers and seeing that nearly all > > received-by mail hops in the original mail use IPv6 addresses > > -- and considering that IPv6 doesn't work anyway -- the whole > > email obviously must have been a complete and utter illusion … > > Thanks for noticing. A new mail server setup is on my todo list, running > a dual stack system is too much work to ipv6 will go away. Even worse, delivering email over ipv6 to the mail giants is a far worse experience than via ipv4. More emails arrive when you disable ipv6 on your mail servers. Kind regards, Job -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20191003/36674e75/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]