[ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jens Link
lists at quux.de
Thu Oct 3 13:55:32 CEST 2019
Uros Gaber <uros at ub330.net> writes: > 1. WHY should it have NAT NATs are good. They provide security. > 2. What do you understand under class, IPv4 "Classes" are just defined > subnet groups (simply put) Things need names. Numbers are hard to remember. We have Class-A for /8, Class-B for /16 and Class-C for /24. We need names for the others as well. > 3. AFAIK DHCPv6 is defined in RFC (3319,3646,4704,5007,6221,6355,6939,8415) But it's DHCPv6. Not DHCP! It works differently. And Android does not support it. Enterprise Customers want DHCP! > 6. Dots and colon, what's the difference? I have do change my regex. > 7. Use DNS to resolve - no [] needed then. DNS is to hard, to complex and fails to often. And in enterprise networks it probably done by another team. > [5] what does the script have to do with network layer? The script was just an example for software breaking when you implement something that looks completely different like IPv4. I this case the script is parsing log files and netflow data and we are back to the regex. Jens -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Delbrueckstr. 41 | 12051 Berlin, Germany | +49-151-18721264 | | http://blog.quux.de | jabber: jenslink at quux.de | --------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]