[ipv6-wg] comments on Y.Pv6RefModel
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] comments on Y.Pv6RefModel
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] comments on Y.Pv6RefModel
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Antonio Prado
antonio at prado.it
Fri May 25 20:22:44 CEST 2018
On 5/25/18 3:54 PM, Jim Reid wrote: > we should not lose sight of the layer 9+ aspects. These are important too. i agree but i believe there are more suitable locations for issues concerning those aspects. thank you -- antonio -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 195 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20180525/dcc4751f/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] comments on Y.Pv6RefModel
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] comments on Y.Pv6RefModel
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]