[ipv6-wg] Still open for discussion: Invitation to supply feedback on ITU draft Recommendation on IPv6 address planning for IoT

Am 24.05.2018 um 09:18 schrieb Mikael Abrahamsson:
> 
> Some comments:
> 
> "Editor notes: there are a large number of ipv4-ipv6 transition and 
> migration strategies: Teredo, 6to4,
> etc. "
> 
> I'd just like to point out that Teredo and 6to4 aren't migration 
> strategies, they were basically a way to beta-test the technology. 
> Please do not mention them, we're way past beta testing of IPv6. Mention 
> things like 6RD, MAP, NAT64, ds.lite etc. I still see people thinking 
> 6to4 is something that should be deployed today. RFC3068 is already 
> obsoleted by RFC7526 (a 2015 RFC).

So far so good. But in my humble opinion 6rd plays in the same class as 
all other ipv4-based tunnels are doing. Of course isatap and 6rd may 
better monitored but they still depending on ipv4.
Please exclude 6rd in your recommendation.


Regards,
Thomas