[ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document - draft v.2 for review.

Anno domini 2017 Tim Chown scripsit:

Hi,

> But we should not do anything to preclude privacy-enhancing methods being applied at any layer.
> 
> I would argue that the BCOP text should say:
> 
> a) ISPs are encouraged to support both stable (persistent) and privacy-oriented (non-persistent) prefixes as options for customers;
> 
> b) stable/persistent prefixes are recommended as the default, in the absence of legal requirements to the contrary in any specific country.
> 
> I’d also note that the biggest UK IPv6 deployment is a “sticky” /56 to residences; it’s hard for an ISP to guarantee a lifetime stable prefix, but they can take steps to minimise the likelihood of a change being needed.

+1

Best
Max
-- 
"Ja und bei Gnome kann man..."
"Ja, aber Gnome ist scheisse!"
"Gnome ist kastriert und KDE langsam..."
 -- Axel Beckert und Lars Dieckow auf dem Linuxwochenende 2009, Wien