[ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Mar 29 09:02:01 CEST 2017
Hi, On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 08:14:59AM +0200, Jan Zorz - Go6 wrote: > > For a PPPoE link these issues are trivially solved to leaving the link > > unnumbered. > > Again, for those, using a PPPoE dialer that would not work. If you are > 100% sure that nobody in your network is connecting using a PPPoE > dialer, ... and your CPEs can cope with having no GUA on the WAN link (like, for doing DNS lookups, or such). They *should*, but ... > then yes, go ahead with unnumbered. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20170329/f8e3651e/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]