[ipv6-wg] IPv6 Prefix delegation BCOP version 3 is out...
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 Prefix delegation BCOP version 3 is out...
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 Prefix delegation BCOP version 3 is out...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz - Go6
jan at go6.si
Thu Jul 27 18:19:49 CEST 2017
On 27/07/2017 17:58, Rob Evans wrote: > This highlighted something for me… > >>> If we decide to use /127 for each point to point link, then it is >>> also advisable to allocate a /64 for each link and use just one >>> /127 out of it to prevent the Neighbor Discovery exhaustion >>> attack (RFC6583). > > The document could do with a pass by a good copy-editor (“we” is > probably not the right language for a BCP). Is that something ISOC > could arrange if you’re facilitating the BCOPs? :-) Hey, Thnx for this comment. Usually (RIPE-501, 554, 631) RIPE NCC staff does the language check and fine-tunes the grammar before publishing the document (and we are more than grateful for that ;) ) I hope that this will be true also in this case... Cheers and thnx, Jan -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 3976 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20170727/a9b9b686/attachment.p7s>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 Prefix delegation BCOP version 3 is out...
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 Prefix delegation BCOP version 3 is out...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]