[ipv6-wg] IPv6 Prefix delegation BCOP version 3 is out...
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 Prefix delegation BCOP version 3 is out...
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 Prefix delegation BCOP version 3 is out...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Wed Jul 5 10:11:12 CEST 2017
Hi Radu, > You should be aware that ISPs do not start directly as big companies. > Some small local ISPs do not consider to be a good "investment" to > become LIR from day 0, so they don't. They start with a small > *assignment* (not very often a sub-allocation) from the upstream > provider > > [...] > > Weather this situation should be treated in the document - not sure. > However having a mention that this is not how things are supposed to > happen would be a good idea. I think this would indeed be a good place to recommend against this, but maybe the other way around: "When providing address space to a smaller ISP you should give them a sub-allocation (not an assignment) that allows them to make properly sized (see the rest of this BCOP) assignments to their customers." or something like that. Cheers! Sander -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 455 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20170705/00791e8f/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 Prefix delegation BCOP version 3 is out...
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 Prefix delegation BCOP version 3 is out...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]