[ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Claudio Ferronato
claudio.ferronato at hynet.it
Wed Apr 5 17:15:28 CEST 2017
Il 05/04/2017 13:26, Jan Zorz - Go6 ha scritto: > Operators who offered ADSL built a PPPoE provisioning and all the > billing infrastructure behind and even if doing PPPoE on FTTH does not > make *any* technical sense, I heard that re-doing and changing the whole > provisioning system would cost them too much, so they went the easy way > - PPPoE over anything/everything. It is what it is and I guess we'll > have to live with it ;) Having a PPPoE interface to every customer also simplify network monitoring (get interface traffic via SNMP, for example) and ethernet VLAN to seperate customers L2 traffic could not be a viable solution, maybe because CPE needs manual configuration to set VID. So, even new operators can find PPPoE better than DHCP or IPoE. Regards Claudio
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]