[ipv6-wg] Happy Eyeballs bias
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Happy Eyeballs bias
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Happy Eyeballs bias
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bajpai, Vaibhav
v.bajpai at jacobs-university.de
Wed Oct 26 19:06:41 CEST 2016
> On 26 Oct 2016, at 17:43, Jen Linkova <furry13 at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Philip Homburg > <pch-ripeml at u-1.phicoh.com> wrote: >> I wonder, if a host has a global IPv6 address that is not derived from any >> kind of transition technology or tunnel, and setting up a TCP connection is >> either slow or fails, then what percentage is due to an issue close to the >> host and what percentage close to the target. >> >> I.e., if IPv6 is broken is there any reason to believe it is often enough >> due to ISP provided services that is would be worth reporting it in a >> roudabout way. > > I'd say that it is much more likely to be broken close to clients, at > least for Alexa web sites.. We cannot generalise this without empirical data. There is also v6 brokenness (or slowness) in ALEXA websites also that not hosted by large CDNs. -- Vaibhav =================================== Vaibhav Bajpai www.vaibhavbajpai.com Postdoctoral Researcher Jacobs University Bremen, Germany ===================================
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Happy Eyeballs bias
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Happy Eyeballs bias
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]