[ipv6-wg] Fwd: [Bp_ixps] IXPs & IPv6

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Fwd: [Bp_ixps] IXPs & IPv6
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Geoff Huston at ESNOG18: Why DANE?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Job Snijders job at instituut.net
Thu Oct 20 17:34:25 CEST 2016

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 04:28:48PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Michael Oghia wrote:
> > Thanks Nick. Sad to hear, but hopefully we can change that.
> 
> you're misunderstanding completely!  It means that ipv6 is considered to
> be of the same importance as ipv4 in the ixp world from the point of
> view of passing production traffic over the ixp fabric.  As far as the
> IXP world is concerned, this is an excellent situation to be in.

yeah the project is finished :)

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Fwd: [Bp_ixps] IXPs & IPv6
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Geoff Huston at ESNOG18: Why DANE?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]