[ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Philip Homburg
pch-ripeml at u-1.phicoh.com
Mon May 23 16:35:11 CEST 2016
> Even though I am only interested in TCP connect times, there is no > TCP-layer test available on RIPE Atlas. Therefore, I leverage TLS > and then look at the underlying metrics reported for TCP. > > Moreover, I cannot do TLS measurement to port 80 because the test > does not like to report TCP layer metrics in situations where the > TLS handshake fails. I did discuss this with Philip Homburg at the > hackathon. One possibility is to either a) refactor the TCP metrics > into a specific TCP test or b) make the TLS test report TCP metrics > even in situations where TLS handshake fails. I personally prefer > b). This not correct/complete. The Atlas traceroute measurement supports TCP. There is no reason to assume that this will not result in valid connect times. Just use a high enough starting ttl and only the target system will see the SYN packets. Philip
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]