[ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nico CARTRON
nicolas at ncartron.org
Mon May 23 14:40:44 CEST 2016
On 23 May 2016 at 14:40:00, Bajpai, Vaibhav (v.bajpai at jacobs-university.de) wrote: > On 23 May 2016, at 14:29, Jen Linkova <furry13 at gmail.com> wrote: > > furry at Wintermute:~>dig dragon.eecs.jacobs-university.de aaaa +short > 2001:638:709:3000::3a > furry at Wintermute:~>telnet -6 dragon.eecs.jacobs-university.de 5000 > Trying 2001:638:709:3000::3a... > telnet: connect to address 2001:638:709:3000::3a: Connection refused > telnet: Unable to connect to remote host > > That host does have IPv6 address in DNS (so no NAT64 is involved) but > nothing is listening on tcp/5000 on that IPv6 address. Fixed. Now it’s listening on both v4 and v6. And works perfectly now, thanks! -- Nico -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20160523/6971e867/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]