[ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bajpai, Vaibhav
v.bajpai at jacobs-university.de
Mon May 23 09:41:15 CEST 2016
Hello Éric, > On 23 May 2016, at 08:48, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke at cisco.com> wrote: > > Hello Vaibhav, > > The map with blue/red is really a nice one :-) Thanks! > May I dare to propose some improvements? > > - on the blue/red map, be sure to have blue meaning all the time > that IPv6 is faster (the legend is unclear and by using those tools, I > know that this is not trivial to do) Yes, good suggestion. > • State the date of the ‘scan' It’s on the homepage. Measured on 21-05-2016. > • Some web sites are in the top 10K of Alexa but are not in: > www.iet.org, www.lesoir.be, .... (Even www.ripe.net is not in the data :-) > but RIPE is only 25.000th so out of your data set) www.ietf.org is ranked ~11K > Again, nice visualisation! If a larger number of people show interest, I might consider spending cycles to run this daily towards all ALEXA 1M (would then include around 60K dual-stacked websites). > -éric Best, Vaibhav =================================== Vaibhav Bajpai www.vaibhavbajpai.com Room 91, Research I School of Engineering and Sciences Jacobs University Bremen, Germany ===================================
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]