[ipv6-wg] IPv6 residential service: What prefix, static, dynamic, extra cost ?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 residential service: What prefix, static, dynamic, extra cost ?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 residential service: What prefix, static, dynamic, extra cost ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Tinka
mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Thu May 19 10:30:24 CEST 2016
On 19/May/16 10:19, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > > > My opinion is that anything between /56 and /48 is fine. As far as I > know, current RIPE policy gives the ISP the option to without > motivation, ask for enough IPv6 addresses to offer each customer a /48 > and I'd like to keep it that way. +1. > > But you're correct, it seems most deployments are going for /56 for no > more reason than that it "should work for everybody". Of course /48 > works as well as it's a superset of /56. I'm not going to give anyone > who gives everybody a /48 a hard time and I don't want RIPE to do it > either. +1. Mark.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 residential service: What prefix, static, dynamic, extra cost ?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 residential service: What prefix, static, dynamic, extra cost ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]