[ipv6-wg] ipv6-wg Digest, Vol 55, Issue 2
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] ipv6-wg Digest, Vol 55, Issue 2
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] ipv6-wg Digest, Vol 55, Issue 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jen Linkova
furry13 at gmail.com
Fri May 6 11:27:08 CEST 2016
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Jens Link <jenslink at quux.de> wrote: > Benedikt Stockebrand <bs at stepladder-it.com> writes: > >> They used AWS/S3 for some relevant stuff, and since it was done >> externally it wasn't properly QAed. When Amazon switched IPv6 off >> again, they had a little bit of an issue. We only found out kind of >> accidentially, especially so because they didn't want to make it all >> that obvious that they are using Amazon. > > Can't be that relevant if it was not monitored properly. Your statement is true - but in the ideal world only... -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] ipv6-wg Digest, Vol 55, Issue 2
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] ipv6-wg Digest, Vol 55, Issue 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]