[ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Tinka
mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Thu Jun 16 07:30:02 CEST 2016
On 15/Jun/16 19:56, Aled Morris wrote: > > > It would also allow providers to deploy IPv6 without having to have > native IPv6 connectivity from their upstreams - as a dynamic tunnel > protocol, LISP is better than a single tunnel to HE or whatever. Perhaps, but I'd also not want to encourage a lack of interest in native IPv6. Mark. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20160616/8d492a53/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]