[ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Paul Hoogsteder
paul at meanie.nl
Mon Jun 13 22:47:51 CEST 2016
On 12-06-16 22:06, Mark Tinka wrote: > > A lot of service providers have poor filtering habits, accepting IPv4 > prefixes as long as /32, IPv6 prefixes as long as /128, and reserved > address space that should not be visible on the Internet. > > Do yourself a solid and filter. > > Mark. Hello Mark, yes - but do remember that RIPE has allocated smaller blocks up to /29 in certain corners of the IPv4 space: 91/8: /29 193/8: /29 194/7: /29 Best regards, Paul Hoogsteder Meanie AS31019
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]