[ipv6-wg] [ipv6-wg-chair] ipv6 deployment startup
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [ipv6-wg-chair] ipv6 deployment startup
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [training] RIPE NCC Webinars - new dates
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Yannis Nikolopoulos
dez at otenet.gr
Tue Sep 22 11:36:50 CEST 2015
Hello, MAP-(E/T) and lw4o6, both recently standardized, should also be considered. cheers, Yannis On 09/15/2015 11:43 AM, Jen Linkova wrote: > Hi Nadim, > > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Nadim Houeiss <nadim at win-dsl.com> wrote: >> looking to start the deployment of ipv6 only network for a new part in my >> network , i need to have info about wish solution will be the best to be >> used for NAT64 techniques for new ipv6 only end users will be able to reach >> ipv4 different services and web servers on the web. > > As far as I know most network vendors (Cisco, Juniper etc) support > NAT64 on their equipment. > However don't forget that you'd need DNS64 as well, so I'd suggest to > check if the DNS solution you are using currently supports DNS64. > > From my experience the main issue is not choosing a vendor for NAT64 > but dealing with broken applications: > - applications which assume than "no IPv4 address" means "no Internet > connectivity" and not even trying to establish any connections if the > device does not receive Ipv4 address; > - applications which are using IPv4 literals; > - applications which ask for "A" DNS RR only, so DNS64 does not help > etc. > >> looking forward for your reply, > > BTW I'm removing ipv-wg-chairs@ (as it is just an alias which is used > to reach RIPE IPv6 Working group chairs) and adding RIPE IPv6 mailing > list. >
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [ipv6-wg-chair] ipv6 deployment startup
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [training] RIPE NCC Webinars - new dates
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]