[ipv6-wg] Implications of NAT/NAT64 and similar

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Implications of NAT/NAT64 and similar
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Implications of NAT/NAT64 and similar

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Sun May 17 22:38:55 CEST 2015

On 17/May/15 19:46, Marc Blanchet wrote:
>  
>
> Right. NAT64-DNS64, while not perfect, is to me the only viable
> solution to move from where we are now to IPv6 in a cost effective
> manner. Running dual-stack is not cost-effective, while ipv6-only
> could be.
>
> When we first talked about NAT64 a while ago, I hated it. But I became
> fast convinced that it is a very important tool to move to IPv6.

IMHO, NAT64/DNS64 is the only real solution out there - one that does
not require an entire re-design of the network once the last IPv4 bit
has been carried.

Mark.

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Implications of NAT/NAT64 and similar
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Implications of NAT/NAT64 and similar

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]