[ipv6-wg] [v6ops] Extension Headers / Impact on Security Devices
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [v6ops] Extension Headers / Impact on Security Devices
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [v6ops] Extension Headers / Impact on Security Devices
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald Bonica
rbonica at juniper.net
Fri Jun 19 23:36:12 CEST 2015
I am aware of one implementation that is almost RFC 7112 compliant. It drops the packet, but fails to send an ICMP message. Ron > Yes, we're aware of RFC7112. It's just: no OS we know and no devices we're > aware of (feel free to provide pointers) implement RFC 7112 as of today.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [v6ops] Extension Headers / Impact on Security Devices
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [v6ops] Extension Headers / Impact on Security Devices
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]