[ipv6-wg] [v6ops] Extension Headers / Impact on Security Devices
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [v6ops] Extension Headers / Impact on Security Devices
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [v6ops] Extension Headers / Impact on Security Devices
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
sthaug at nethelp.no
sthaug at nethelp.no
Wed Jun 17 15:27:50 CEST 2015
> So we all agree that 'variable length is OK as long as our hardware > can look deep enough'? And what people are complaining about is exact > number? Which we do not know yet for IPv6 EHs? Agreed, variable length *by itself* is not the problem. I see *large* variable length headers, in combination with complex parsing rules, as the problem. Steinar Haug, AS 2116
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [v6ops] Extension Headers / Impact on Security Devices
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [v6ops] Extension Headers / Impact on Security Devices
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]