[ipv6-wg] [v6ops] Extension Headers / Impact on Security Devices

> On Jun 16, 2015, at 6:24 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Personally I still think RFC 7045 is the most realistic on this point,
> but Fred would like things to get better ;-).

And I haven't finished with Dennis Ferguson's comment.

Bottom line, if one accepts the present status quo as the state forever, then we should stop with RFC 7045, and (with Fernando) agree to deprecate all extension headers. I'd like to not do that, and the only way I see to not do that is to not accept the status quo.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20150617/a31f017d/attachment.sig>