[ipv6-wg] We suggest that RIPE-554bis CPE equipment requires RFC 7084 and CE-Router Logo. Thank you!
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] We suggest that RIPE-554bis CPE equipment requires RFC 7084 and CE-Router Logo. Thank you!
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [Marketing Mail] Re: We suggest that RIPE-554bis CPE equipment requires RFC 7084 and CE-Router Logo. Thank you!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Merike Kaeo
merike at doubleshotsecurity.com
Fri Jan 9 09:27:15 CET 2015
On Jan 9, 2015, at 12:22 AM, "Jan Zorz @ go6.si" <jan at go6.si> wrote: > On 07/01/15 11:38, Ole Troan wrote: >> there are at least eight IETF solutions (L2TP, DS-lite, 464XLAT, >> Public 4over6, Lightweight 4over6, 4rd, MAP-T, MAP-E) to the same >> problem (IPv4 or shared IPv4 over IPv6). it's going to be interesting >> to figure out how 554bis should deal with that. > > Hi, > > my first thought would be to put them in Optional section? :) I would agree with this since all the options were developed for varying use cases and I'm not sure there's definitive subset we want to recommend. - merike > > What do you think or suggest? > > Cheers, Jan > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 495 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20150109/ff150a52/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] We suggest that RIPE-554bis CPE equipment requires RFC 7084 and CE-Router Logo. Thank you!
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [Marketing Mail] Re: We suggest that RIPE-554bis CPE equipment requires RFC 7084 and CE-Router Logo. Thank you!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]