[ipv6-wg] We suggest that RIPE-554bis CPE equipment requires RFC 7084 and CE-Router Logo. Thank you!

OTOH talking about DS-lite & co, my view of RIPE-554 is that it is really
useful for SMB or larger enterprises to specify what they have to acquire.
And, I am unsure about the use case of MAP, 6RD,. . .  technologies for
this kind of organizations.

SP buying large quantities of ‘managed’ CPE should know by now about 6RD,
MAP, … :-) so they do not need RIPE-554 (even if it still useful for part
of their networks)

Residential subscribers should indeed only rely on IPv6-ready CPE logo.

-éric


On 7/01/15 11:15, "Mikael Abrahamsson" <swmike at swm.pp.se> wrote:

>On Mon, 5 Jan 2015, Ole Troan wrote:
>
>>>
>>> ．       RFC6204 (Basic Requirements for IPv6 Customer Edge Routers) *
>>>=>
>>> RFC7084 and requires CE-Router Logo <image001.png>
>>
>> the delta between 6204 and 7084 is largely the addition of the 6rd and
>>DS-lite.
>> since 7084 was published quite a lot has happened on new mechanisms for
>>IPv4 address sharing. e.g. MAP. I would think 554bis should take those
>>into account as well.
>
>This is an interesting discussion. MAP and LW4o6 would be interesting
>mechanisms to require support for, absolutely. I am not sure how much of
>the control plane for these mechanisms that are actually done and in
>published RFCs yet, but will look into it!
>
>It's hard to require support for something that might not be 100% done
>and 
>deployable using available RFCs, even though there are multiple
>implementations of these already.
>
>-- 
>Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se