[ipv6-wg] Promote the use of IRC
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Promote the use of IRC
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Promote the use of IRC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
niall.oreilly at ucd.ie
Thu Aug 13 12:46:48 CEST 2015
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:55:04 +0100, Shane Kerr wrote: > > Niall, [...] > > I have run software teams that used chat rooms for discussion, even > with the developers scattered across 5 or 6 time zones. Our rule was > that any "official" discussions happened on-list and all decisions were > made there, I think such a rule needs to be very clearly understood. I didn't see anything like this in Daniel's start-of-thread message. Since then, he has clarified what he has in mind. On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 16:17:10 +0100, Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT) wrote: > > As Im saying in the other lists, im not talking about replacing the > list, just complementing it. Good. On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:55:04 +0100, Shane Kerr wrote: > but it was often handy to be able to talk to people in real > time. So it is possible to add chat rooms to the mix while still > keeping a single place for official discussions. > > I'm not a strong advocate for IRC or any real-time technology for the > IPv6 working group, but I also don't see any reason to be opposed to it. I'm reassured. Thanks. ATB, Niall
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Promote the use of IRC
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Promote the use of IRC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]