[ipv6-wg] Vacancy - nominations can go here

I'm confused. Are you (Marco) and Shane also going to (eventually) step 
down? I hope not.
Also, about the right number of co-chairs, I think 2 is the one, but 3 
seems to work for this WG.

cheers,
Yannis

On 05/18/2014 11:00 AM, Marco Hogewoning wrote:
> Please wait a bit :)
>
> a) there might be others
> b) as much as we don’t like overhead, let’s come up with some procedure
> c) I need to have a chat with Shane on exactly how we are going to do this
>
> I had several people including one of the candidates asking for a soft landing, where Shane and I gradually remove ourselves out of this, rather than just running off. So at a minimum we need to fix this in terms of timelines.
>
> Also it is not a given that there must be three, I think 4 is too many and you definitely need 2 for redundancy.
>
> First question to the group: how many working group chairs do you want in the end?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Marco
>
>
> On 17 mei 2014, at 19:53, Roger Jψrgensen <rogerj at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Jan Zorz @ go6.si <jan at go6.si> wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> But now we've got 3 very good candidates - Jen, Dave and Benedikt - and I
>>> think we should rotate them in.
>> Excellent suggestion, let's rotate Jen, Dave and Benedikt in.
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> Roger Jorgensen           | ROJO9-RIPE
>> rogerj at gmail.com          | - IPv6 is The Key!
>> http://www.jorgensen.no   | roger at jorgensen.no
>>
>