[ipv6-wg] 96 more bits... time for some magic after all?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 96 more bits... time for some magic after all?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 96 more bits... time for some magic after all?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
S.P.Zeidler
spz at serpens.de
Fri Oct 25 17:53:13 CEST 2013
Thus wrote Shane Kerr (shane at time-travellers.org): > We saw two presentations by network architects at the RIPE meeting that > used bits in their IPv6 addressing plan to carry meaning beyond simple > network topology and packet routing. > > For example, declaring a specific bit in the address to be 1 for voice > traffic or 0 otherwise. [...] > What should we do about it? As a RIR, nothing. Otherwise: violations of the KISS principle are rarely a good idea. In this case, you might find out that you snuck yourself into a straightjacket a few years down the line. regards, spz -- spz at serpens.de (S.P.Zeidler)
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 96 more bits... time for some magic after all?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 96 more bits... time for some magic after all?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]