[ipv6-wg] 96 more bits... time for some magic after all?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 96 more bits... time for some magic after all?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 96 more bits... time for some magic after all?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz
jan at pragma.si
Fri Oct 25 12:55:56 CEST 2013
On 10/25/13 12:37 PM, Shane Kerr wrote: > Using bits in IPv6 networks for other purposes is orthogonal to those > goals. > > What should we do about it? > Hey, As far as I know, the rule-of-thumb is to allocate /48 per customer. As long as they don't go beyond that, there's nothing to do :) We had a long chat with Peter Lothberg about that during one of the evenings and we calculated that with his addressing and /29 you could number the whole Germany. One provider. I see no need to change the rules, maybe we could mention the /48-per-site-or-per-customer-or-per-end-user-or-whatever-you-want-to-call-it suggestion when writing the assignment plan to get bigger IPv6 space :) Cheers, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 96 more bits... time for some magic after all?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 96 more bits... time for some magic after all?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]