You are here: Home > Participate > Join a Discussion > RIPE Mailing Lists > The ipv6-wg Archives

[ipv6-wg] [address-policy-wg] Reminder:Cosmetic Surgery Project, new revised RIPE Policy, document for IPv6 database objects

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Reminder:Cosmetic Surgery Project, new revised RIPE Policy, document for IPv6 database objects
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE 554 Errata Page

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Martin Stanislav ms at uakom.sk
Tue May 28 10:16:54 CEST 2013

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 02:43:32PM +0200, Emilio Madaio wrote:
> 
> A draft of the policy document is now online and ready for community
> review at:
> 
> https://www.ripe.net/ripe/readability/improving-the-readability-of-ripe-documents

May I suggest to omit the first occurence of "Only" in the section "2.1 Definitions" to keep to text more self-contained?

Currently proposed text:
Only the inet6num object may use the value of "AGGREGATED-BY-LIR" for the “status:" attribute and contain the attribute “assignment-size:”.

Suggested change:
The inet6num object may use the value of "AGGREGATED-BY-LIR" for the “status:" attribute and contain the attribute “assignment-size:”.

Martin

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Reminder:Cosmetic Surgery Project, new revised RIPE Policy, document for IPv6 database objects
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE 554 Errata Page

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]