[ipv6-wg] RIPE 554 Errata Page
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE 554 Errata Page
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE 554 Errata Page
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Mon May 27 00:07:51 CEST 2013
Hi Peter, >> anything in the document without getting a new RIPE document number. But >> having to many different versions of the document confuses our audience. > > why is the audience less confused by the same number referencing different > content? This is about 'same content, but with typo's fixed', not about completely new content. If the content changes then I agree we need a new number. Otherwise we end up with references like 'RIPE-554, the version just before they replaced RFC xxxx with RFC yyyy'. Companies must still be able to say things like 'our products comply to RIPE-554' without any confusion. Cheers, Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE 554 Errata Page
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE 554 Errata Page
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]