From marcoh at marcoh.net Fri Dec 13 10:32:59 2013 From: marcoh at marcoh.net (Marco Hogewoning) Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:32:59 +0100 Subject: [ipv6-wg] Follow up on RIPE67 IPv6 Only experiment Message-ID: <11CC31A3-BEEA-49A0-8675-EC7437EC90ED@marcoh.net> Dear colleagues, Just to let you know that, based on experience in Athens, I put up a blogpost on Circle-ID about running IPv6 only. http://www.circleid.com/posts/20131212_are_we_ready_to_switch_off_ipv4/ Would also love to hear from you wether we should aim to repeat this experiment in Warsaw. Or maybe you have an idea of something else that you think is worth trying, please let us know. Best, MarcoH -- "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" -- Albert Einstein From mir at ripe.net Fri Dec 13 10:41:47 2013 From: mir at ripe.net (Mirjam Kuehne) Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:41:47 +0100 Subject: [ipv6-wg] Follow up on RIPE67 IPv6 Only experiment In-Reply-To: <11CC31A3-BEEA-49A0-8675-EC7437EC90ED@marcoh.net> References: <11CC31A3-BEEA-49A0-8675-EC7437EC90ED@marcoh.net> Message-ID: <52AAD65B.5050409@ripe.net> Hello, And of course this article is also on RIPE Labs: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/marco_hogewoning/are-we-ready-to-switch-off-ipv4 If you have any suggestions or comments, please don't hesitate to leave a comment under the article. Kind regards, Mirjam Kuehne RIPE NCC On 13/12/13 10:32 AM, Marco Hogewoning wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > Just to let you know that, based on experience in Athens, I put up a blogpost on Circle-ID about running IPv6 only. > > http://www.circleid.com/posts/20131212_are_we_ready_to_switch_off_ipv4/ > > Would also love to hear from you wether we should aim to repeat this experiment in Warsaw. Or maybe you have an idea of something else that you think is worth trying, please let us know. > > Best, > > MarcoH > From gert at space.net Fri Dec 13 12:33:43 2013 From: gert at space.net (Gert Doering) Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 12:33:43 +0100 Subject: [ipv6-wg] Follow up on RIPE67 IPv6 Only experiment In-Reply-To: <11CC31A3-BEEA-49A0-8675-EC7437EC90ED@marcoh.net> References: <11CC31A3-BEEA-49A0-8675-EC7437EC90ED@marcoh.net> Message-ID: <20131213113343.GX81676@Space.Net> Hi, On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:32:59AM +0100, Marco Hogewoning wrote: > Just to let you know that, based on experience in Athens, I put up a blogpost on Circle-ID about running IPv6 only. > > http://www.circleid.com/posts/20131212_are_we_ready_to_switch_off_ipv4/ > > Would also love to hear from you wether we should aim to repeat this > experiment in Warsaw. I expected this to become part of the standard setup after the RIPE meeting in Berlin :-) - so: yes, please. (For Warsaw, we should have fixed the OpenVPN warts people have seen as well ;-) ) Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 826 bytes Desc: not available URL: From marcoh at marcoh.net Fri Dec 13 12:42:35 2013 From: marcoh at marcoh.net (Marco Hogewoning) Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 12:42:35 +0100 Subject: [ipv6-wg] Follow up on RIPE67 IPv6 Only experiment In-Reply-To: <20131213113343.GX81676@Space.Net> References: <11CC31A3-BEEA-49A0-8675-EC7437EC90ED@marcoh.net> <20131213113343.GX81676@Space.Net> Message-ID: > I expected this to become part of the standard setup after the RIPE meeting > in Berlin :-) - so: yes, please. If I recall correctly the Berlin Experiment resulted in me not having any connectivity. Now I know that a lot of speakers would appreciate the fact that usually it means people pay more attention to the talk, I would like to keep us online :) Joking aside, thanks for your support and we'll of course have a chat with our colleagues from the IT department to see if we can continue this as a standard feature of the meeting network. Marco From roger at jorgensen.no Fri Dec 13 13:24:22 2013 From: roger at jorgensen.no (=?UTF-8?Q?Roger_J=C3=B8rgensen?=) Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:24:22 +0200 Subject: [ipv6-wg] Follow up on RIPE67 IPv6 Only experiment In-Reply-To: <11CC31A3-BEEA-49A0-8675-EC7437EC90ED@marcoh.net> References: <11CC31A3-BEEA-49A0-8675-EC7437EC90ED@marcoh.net> Message-ID: On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:32:59 +0100, Marco Hogewoning wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > Just to let you know that, based on experience in Athens, I put up a > blogpost on Circle-ID about running IPv6 only. > > > http://www.circleid.com/posts/20131212_are_we_ready_to_switch_off_ipv4/ > > Would also love to hear from you wether we should aim to repeat this > experiment in Warsaw. Or maybe you have an idea of something else > that > you think is worth trying, please let us know. oh, I thought it was part of the default setup for all events from now and into the future? ... or go read Gert's mail, he said it better:-) --- ------------------------------ Roger Jorgensen | - ROJO9-RIPE roger at jorgensen.no | - The Future is IPv6 ------------------------------------------------------- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? From bs at stepladder-it.com Mon Dec 16 15:56:10 2013 From: bs at stepladder-it.com (Benedikt Stockebrand) Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:56:10 +0000 Subject: [ipv6-wg] Follow up on RIPE67 IPv6 Only experiment In-Reply-To: <11CC31A3-BEEA-49A0-8675-EC7437EC90ED@marcoh.net> (Marco Hogewoning's message of "Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:32:59 +0100") References: <11CC31A3-BEEA-49A0-8675-EC7437EC90ED@marcoh.net> Message-ID: <87ppowq1yt.fsf@stepladder-it.com> Hi Marco, > Just to let you know that, based on experience in Athens, I put up a > blogpost on Circle-ID about running IPv6 only. and a nice one, too... > Would also love to hear from you wether we should aim to repeat this > experiment in Warsaw. Yes, please do. > Or maybe you have an idea of something else that you think is worth > trying, please let us know. If I may offer one more suggestion, what about a "real" IPv6-only network without 464XLAT or anything, preferably as yet another SSID? I don't have the details of the WiFi setup at the RIPE meetings, so I have no idea how much effort it is, but if it isn't any serious extra effort, I'd consider that quite useful. This *will* break things, but that way we can see *what* breaks, so we can figure out what things need to be fixed. Cheers, Benedikt -- Business Grade IPv6 Consulting, Training, Projects Benedikt Stockebrand, Dipl.-Inform. http://www.stepladder-it.com/