[ipv6-wg] RIPE-501 replacement document - IPsec question to community - we need your input.

On 26 Jan 2012, at 08:50, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote:

> On 1/2/12 3:08 PM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
>> Here is my voice: remove IPsec mandatory to all devices EXCEPT for
>> router supporting OSPFv3 (ESP-null in transport mode being mandatory)
>> and for firewall (where IKEv3 and IPsecv3 are mandatory)
> 
> Eric, @all
> 
> This question is now preventing the new draft to be published, as we think it's very important so solve it in a way, that makes sense and at the same time not to go against IETF and RFC specs. Sometimes this two clashes :)
> 
> Community: Please, give us more input, so we can decide and write down something, that is what community thinks - otherwise we'll have to listen to sample of 6 voices.

Jan,

I agree pushing 501-bis asap should be a priority.

Is there a pointer to the diffs between 501-bis and specific RFCs?  Obviously I could go and look it up, just wondered if a list of differences already existed in a previous post or article.

Tim