[ipv6-wg] RIPE-501 replacement document - IPsec question to community - we need your input.
Tim Chown tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Thu Jan 26 15:22:07 CET 2012
On 26 Jan 2012, at 08:50, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: > On 1/2/12 3:08 PM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote: >> Here is my voice: remove IPsec mandatory to all devices EXCEPT for >> router supporting OSPFv3 (ESP-null in transport mode being mandatory) >> and for firewall (where IKEv3 and IPsecv3 are mandatory) > > Eric, @all > > This question is now preventing the new draft to be published, as we think it's very important so solve it in a way, that makes sense and at the same time not to go against IETF and RFC specs. Sometimes this two clashes :) > > Community: Please, give us more input, so we can decide and write down something, that is what community thinks - otherwise we'll have to listen to sample of 6 voices. Jan, I agree pushing 501-bis asap should be a priority. Is there a pointer to the diffs between 501-bis and specific RFCs? Obviously I could go and look it up, just wondered if a list of differences already existed in a previous post or article. Tim
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]