[ipv6-wg] Last call on the replacement of ripe-501 "Requirements for IPv6 in ICT equipment"

Tassos,

> I noticed [I-D.ymbk-aplusp] on the list, which recently became RFC 6346.
> Besides updating the list, do you find it appropriate to include RFCs with experimental status?

I think we should apply reasonable judgement.

with regards to A+P, that's an architecture document. I don't understand how an implementation could support that.
there are a number of A+P-ish solutions being worked on in the softwire wg. 4rd, dIVI and ds-lite + A+P.
plus a general stateless address mapping document and DHCP option.
these are the A+P solutions, but way too early to include any of this work.
I do not think 6346 belongs in RIPE-501.

> Also 3484bis is still in draft.

3484bis fixes some real problems. hopefully it will be RFC before 501 is out.

> If we include drafts, then 6204 should also be changed to 6204bis.
> Although i would prefer to have the final RFCs in.

I have suggested to just shelf 6204bis until we have something to put in it.
501 already has the references to 6rd and ds-lite that 6204bis adds. so not needed.

cheers,
Ole