[ipv6-wg] IPv6 on P2P links
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 on P2P links
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 on P2P links
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at marcoh.net
Thu May 26 14:43:36 CEST 2011
On May 26, 2011, at 2:25 PM, Yannis Nikolopoulos wrote: > so, > > other than the fact that it's wasteful, is there any other reason for not using /64 (that's what we're using) on p2p links? I wouldn't describe it as wastwful, every subnet is per standard /64 anyway. The primary reason are security concerns like the fact that you might be able to trick a machine into sending loads of ND messages (or responses), filling up the neighbor cache or CAM table. Marco
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 on P2P links
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 on P2P links
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]