[ipv6-wg] IPv6 on P2P links
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 on P2P links
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 on P2P links
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Us
us at sweet-sorrow.com
Thu May 26 10:22:48 CEST 2011
On 05/26/2011 10:07 AM, Jasper Jans wrote: > Can anyone give me some real world experience with IPv6 numbering on P2P links in their network? > > I've seen the recommendations swing from '/64' to '/127 if your equipment can handle it' and even > to 'do not assign anything at all just use link-local' and access your devices over the loopback > which your IGP will distribute. > > The last option seems interesting to me from a IP assignment point of few. It safes me having > to allocate a block for this part of the infrastructure. I'm just wondering if in the long run > it will not make life harder. > > Jasper > > > Op dit e-mailbericht is een disclaimer van toepassing, welke te vinden is op http://www.espritxb.nl/disclaimer > > > Our ISP is trying to stick with /64 P2P address space. But I've also seen by one of our upstream providers, that they use /112. I don't want to mention them, because their service sucks and the P2P global IPs cannot be pinged, while LL addresses work Us
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 on P2P links
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 on P2P links
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]