From nathalie at ripe.net Tue Mar 15 13:25:20 2011 From: nathalie at ripe.net (Nathalie Trenaman) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:25:20 +0100 Subject: [ipv6-wg] "Preparing an IPv6 Addressing Plan" - New Manual Published on www.ripe.net Message-ID: <7F7CFC1D-52E2-4B74-89DE-DB993E7A03EB@ripe.net> Dear colleagues, The RIPE NCC has just published "Preparing an IPv6 Addressing Plan", an easy-to-read manual to help End Users effectively distribute large blocks of IPv6 address space over their networks. The document is available for download here: http://www.ripe.net/training/material/IPv6-for-LIRs-Training-Course/IPv6_addr_plan4.pdf The manual was written by Sander Steffann and Surfnet. It has been translated from Dutch to English by the RIPE NCC. If you have any feedback about the manual, please send it to: Kind Regards, Nathalie Trenaman RIPE NCC Trainer -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From henk at uijterwaal.nl Tue Mar 15 22:25:41 2011 From: henk at uijterwaal.nl (Henk Uijterwaal) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 22:25:41 +0100 Subject: [ipv6-wg] Re: ipv6-wg -- confirmation of subscription -- request 440625 In-Reply-To: <20110315211712.30794.30981.Mailman@postboy.ripe.net> References: <20110315211712.30794.30981.Mailman@postboy.ripe.net> Message-ID: <4D7FD955.1070203@uijterwaal.nl> confirm 440625 From mir at ripe.net Mon Mar 21 13:16:59 2011 From: mir at ripe.net (Mirjam Kuehne) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:16:59 +0100 Subject: [ipv6-wg] New on RIPE Labs: 6to4 - Why is it so Bad? Message-ID: <4D8741BB.3020700@ripe.net> [apologies for duplicates] Dear colleagues, In an earlier article on RIPE Labs, we showed that a large percentage of 6to4 connections fail. In this new article by Emile Aben, we look at why these connections fail and what can be done about this: http://labs.ripe.net/Members/emileaben/6to4-why-is-it-so-bad Kind Regards, Mirjam Kuehne RIPE NCC From Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie Tue Mar 29 13:22:21 2011 From: Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie (Niall O'Reilly) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:22:21 +0100 Subject: [ipv6-wg] Is there a recommended list for sharing IPv6 deployment experience/woes/etc? References: <20110329110246.GS20940@gcd.ie> Message-ID: <692D3687-A0AD-4BF9-8CAA-C0C4AAF77FA3@ucd.ie> A colleague in the Irish IPv6 TF was asking, and I couldn't think of just the right list. The kind of sharing of operational experience he's looking for doesn't seem to me to fall quite within the scope of the RIPE IPv6 WG list, and certanly not within the IETF v6ops list. I'll be glad to find I'm mistaken, or else to have suggestions ... Thanks in advance. Niall Begin forwarded message: > From: Gavin McCullagh > Date: 29 March 2011 12:02:46 GMT+01:00 > To: Irish IPv6 Task Force > Subject: [Ipv6tf] spoofed router advertisements > Reply-To: Gavin McCullagh > > > Hi folks, > > I realise this isn't a list for practical details of running IPv6, but is > there a list people do recommend? > > For some time now, on and off, we've been noticing bogus IPv6 router > advertisements, presumably from student laptops. [...] From shane at time-travellers.org Tue Mar 29 13:35:46 2011 From: shane at time-travellers.org (Shane Kerr) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:35:46 +0200 Subject: [ipv6-wg] Is there a recommended list for sharing IPv6 deployment experience/woes/etc? In-Reply-To: <692D3687-A0AD-4BF9-8CAA-C0C4AAF77FA3@ucd.ie> References: <20110329110246.GS20940@gcd.ie> <692D3687-A0AD-4BF9-8CAA-C0C4AAF77FA3@ucd.ie> Message-ID: <1301398546.2912.63.camel@localhost.localdomain> Niall, You probably want the ipv6-ops list: http://lists.cluenet.de/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-ops -- Shane On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 12:22 +0100, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > A colleague in the Irish IPv6 TF was asking, and I couldn't > think of just the right list. The kind of sharing of operational > experience he's looking for doesn't seem to me to fall quite > within the scope of the RIPE IPv6 WG list, and certanly not > within the IETF v6ops list. > > I'll be glad to find I'm mistaken, or else to have suggestions ... > > Thanks in advance. > > Niall > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > From: Gavin McCullagh > > Date: 29 March 2011 12:02:46 GMT+01:00 > > To: Irish IPv6 Task Force > > Subject: [Ipv6tf] spoofed router advertisements > > Reply-To: Gavin McCullagh > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > I realise this isn't a list for practical details of running IPv6, but is > > there a list people do recommend? > > > > For some time now, on and off, we've been noticing bogus IPv6 router > > advertisements, presumably from student laptops. [...] > From marcoh at marcoh.net Tue Mar 29 13:53:20 2011 From: marcoh at marcoh.net (Marco Hogewoning) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:53:20 +0200 Subject: [ipv6-wg] Is there a recommended list for sharing IPv6 deployment experience/woes/etc? In-Reply-To: <692D3687-A0AD-4BF9-8CAA-C0C4AAF77FA3@ucd.ie> References: <20110329110246.GS20940@gcd.ie> <692D3687-A0AD-4BF9-8CAA-C0C4AAF77FA3@ucd.ie> Message-ID: <4E8BB527-AD8A-408D-A586-85559DC540D4@marcoh.net> Well, I would be happy to declare this on topic for the IPv6 WG (and the list). I personally think the community at large would benefit from people sharing their deployment experiences, talk about which pitfalls they encountered and how they avoided them in the end. It is also clearly stated in the charter that deployment experiences are on topic. As Shane already pointed out, for the technical discussions cluenet ipv6-ops is a nice alternative. Grtx, MarcoH On Mar 29, 2011, at 1:22 PM, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > A colleague in the Irish IPv6 TF was asking, and I couldn't > think of just the right list. The kind of sharing of operational > experience he's looking for doesn't seem to me to fall quite > within the scope of the RIPE IPv6 WG list, and certanly not > within the IETF v6ops list. > > I'll be glad to find I'm mistaken, or else to have suggestions ... > > Thanks in advance. > > Niall > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Gavin McCullagh >> Date: 29 March 2011 12:02:46 GMT+01:00 >> To: Irish IPv6 Task Force >> Subject: [Ipv6tf] spoofed router advertisements >> Reply-To: Gavin McCullagh >> >> >> Hi folks, >> >> I realise this isn't a list for practical details of running IPv6, but is >> there a list people do recommend? >> >> For some time now, on and off, we've been noticing bogus IPv6 router >> advertisements, presumably from student laptops. [...] > From Tero.Toikkanen at nebula.fi Tue Mar 29 13:56:35 2011 From: Tero.Toikkanen at nebula.fi (Tero Toikkanen) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:56:35 +0000 Subject: [ipv6-wg] Is there a recommended list for sharing IPv6 deployment experience/woes/etc? In-Reply-To: <4E8BB527-AD8A-408D-A586-85559DC540D4@marcoh.net> References: <20110329110246.GS20940@gcd.ie> <692D3687-A0AD-4BF9-8CAA-C0C4AAF77FA3@ucd.ie> <4E8BB527-AD8A-408D-A586-85559DC540D4@marcoh.net> Message-ID: Also NANOG mailing list might be a suitable forum for this. In any case, Windows Internet connection sharing might cause such behaviour. ____________________________________ Tero Toikkanen Nebula Oy > -----Original Message----- > From: ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net] On > Behalf Of Marco Hogewoning > Sent: 29. maaliskuuta 2011 14:53 > To: Niall O'Reilly > Cc: ipv6-wg at ripe.net; Irish IPv6 Task Force > Subject: Re: [ipv6-wg] Is there a recommended list for sharing IPv6 > deployment experience/woes/etc? > > Well, I would be happy to declare this on topic for the IPv6 WG (and the > list). > > I personally think the community at large would benefit from people > sharing their deployment experiences, talk about which pitfalls they > encountered and how they avoided them in the end. It is also clearly stated > in the charter that deployment experiences are on topic. > > As Shane already pointed out, for the technical discussions cluenet ipv6-ops > is a nice alternative. > > Grtx, > > MarcoH > > On Mar 29, 2011, at 1:22 PM, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > > > A colleague in the Irish IPv6 TF was asking, and I couldn't > > think of just the right list. The kind of sharing of operational > > experience he's looking for doesn't seem to me to fall quite > > within the scope of the RIPE IPv6 WG list, and certanly not > > within the IETF v6ops list. > > > > I'll be glad to find I'm mistaken, or else to have suggestions ... > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Niall > > > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > >> From: Gavin McCullagh > >> Date: 29 March 2011 12:02:46 GMT+01:00 > >> To: Irish IPv6 Task Force > >> Subject: [Ipv6tf] spoofed router advertisements > >> Reply-To: Gavin McCullagh > >> > >> > >> Hi folks, > >> > >> I realise this isn't a list for practical details of running IPv6, > >> but is there a list people do recommend? > >> > >> For some time now, on and off, we've been noticing bogus IPv6 router > >> advertisements, presumably from student laptops. [...] > > From ahmed at tamkien.com Tue Mar 29 14:02:31 2011 From: ahmed at tamkien.com (Ahmed Abu-Abed) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:02:31 +0200 Subject: [ipv6-wg] Is there a recommended list for sharing IPv6 deployment experience/woes/etc? In-Reply-To: <692D3687-A0AD-4BF9-8CAA-C0C4AAF77FA3@ucd.ie> References: <20110329110246.GS20940@gcd.ie> <692D3687-A0AD-4BF9-8CAA-C0C4AAF77FA3@ucd.ie> Message-ID: <60014D78862645A48E07404D571612D3@mTOSH> Two web based discussion groups come to mind, and these have global followers: a. http://gogonet.gogo6.com . Much of the discussions on gogonet are about IPv6 access. You also have country sub-groups, and good technology implementation discussion groups there. For example the IPv6 Security group on gogonet has the occasional input by authors of the Cisco press book on v6 security. b. Linkedin.com where there is an active IPv6 Group which shares experiences Regards, -Ahmed From: Niall O'Reilly Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 1:22 PM To: ipv6-wg at ripe.net Cc: Irish IPv6 Task Force Subject: [ipv6-wg] Is there a recommended list for sharing IPv6 deployment experience/woes/etc? A colleague in the Irish IPv6 TF was asking, and I couldn't think of just the right list. The kind of sharing of operational experience he's looking for doesn't seem to me to fall quite within the scope of the RIPE IPv6 WG list, and certanly not within the IETF v6ops list. I'll be glad to find I'm mistaken, or else to have suggestions ... Thanks in advance. Niall Begin forwarded message: > From: Gavin McCullagh > Date: 29 March 2011 12:02:46 GMT+01:00 > To: Irish IPv6 Task Force > Subject: [Ipv6tf] spoofed router advertisements > Reply-To: Gavin McCullagh > > > Hi folks, > > I realise this isn't a list for practical details of running IPv6, but is > there a list people do recommend? > > For some time now, on and off, we've been noticing bogus IPv6 router > advertisements, presumably from student laptops. [...] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ruben at verweg.com Tue Mar 29 14:06:49 2011 From: ruben at verweg.com (Ruben van Staveren) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:06:49 +0200 Subject: [ipv6-wg] Is there a recommended list for sharing IPv6 deployment experience/woes/etc? In-Reply-To: <692D3687-A0AD-4BF9-8CAA-C0C4AAF77FA3@ucd.ie> References: <20110329110246.GS20940@gcd.ie> <692D3687-A0AD-4BF9-8CAA-C0C4AAF77FA3@ucd.ie> Message-ID: On 29 Mar 2011, at 13:22, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > A colleague in the Irish IPv6 TF was asking, and I couldn't > think of just the right list. The kind of sharing of operational > experience he's looking for doesn't seem to me to fall quite > within the scope of the RIPE IPv6 WG list, and certanly not > within the IETF v6ops list. > > I'll be glad to find I'm mistaken, or else to have suggestions ... > > Thanks in advance. > > Niall Might it be an idea to push ipv6actnow.org more in that direction as a clear and visible platform ? Regards, Ruben From Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie Tue Mar 29 14:40:14 2011 From: Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie (Niall O'Reilly) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:40:14 +0100 Subject: [ipv6-wg] Is there a recommended list for sharing IPv6 deployment experience/woes/etc? In-Reply-To: <4E8BB527-AD8A-408D-A586-85559DC540D4@marcoh.net> References: <20110329110246.GS20940@gcd.ie> <692D3687-A0AD-4BF9-8CAA-C0C4AAF77FA3@ucd.ie> <4E8BB527-AD8A-408D-A586-85559DC540D4@marcoh.net> Message-ID: <6FF351BF-96AB-4D19-826F-1E5AAE561C67@ucd.ie> On 29 Mar 2011, at 12:53, Marco Hogewoning wrote: > As Shane already pointed out, for the technical discussions cluenet ipv6-ops is a nice alternative. D'oh! I must need new glasses. That's with "ip" and a hyphen: not at all like "v6ops"! TVM to you both /Niall