[ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Tue Jun 21 09:53:58 CEST 2011
On 6/21/11 9:34 AM, Ivan Pepelnjak wrote: >> There must be better ways to address the problem in an IPv6 >> environment with L4 termination or L7 application layer proxies >> coming to mind. > > I guess not many ops-focused people have the luxury to care. > Regardless of how you do it, you lose end-to-end connectivity and > some visibility (the latter is BTW mandated by some standards like > PCI). > >> For me however, for a load balanced service, the requirement is one >> name in the DNS and not a single IP (v4 or v6) address. > > In a perfect world with perfectly architected and implemented TCP > stacks and no security issues mandating browser DNS pinning, you're > absolutely correct. > > In the imperfect world we have to live in, you usually stop fighting > the windmills and use a single IP address if you have to get enough > nines. > > Ivan > Pragatism as paradigm. I like that. BTW, do we have any LB vendor on the list with some useful suggestion? Cheers, /jan
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]