SV: [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...

• Previous message (by thread): SV: [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Sander Steffann sander at steffann.nl
Mon Jun 20 22:51:03 CEST 2011

Hi,

> A loadbalancer is a loadbalancer is a loadbalancer.....
> It should perform the same function in v6 as in in v4. So is there
> a definition on loadbalancers in general? Do we need to define
> what layer it´s working on?

I don't know... We might. If we are going to provide guidelines for tender initiators for buying load balancers, what useful guidelines can we provide? We provide a list of mandatory and optional RFCs for the other equipment, so which RFCs does a load balancer need to support?

- Sander

• Previous message (by thread): SV: [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]