[ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
kzorba at otenet.gr
kzorba at otenet.gr
Mon Jun 20 20:34:04 CEST 2011
Quoting Ivan Pepelnjak <ip at ioshints.info>: > The minimum you need for load balancers is IPv6 host support, you > might add OPTIONAL support for routing protocols. > > Obviously they need to support 6-to-4 and 6-to-6 load balancing ... > are there any RFCs covering those? > This is indeed the question. Is there any work (in IETF probably) that describes what a load balancer is and what it should support in an IPv6 environment? If not I think we need to improvise. I also think that load balancing is crucial to the deployment not only for IPv6 content but any IPv6 service that needs to scale. Kostas > Ivan >
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]