[ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Chown
tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Mon Jun 20 12:19:37 CEST 2011
On 20 Jun 2011, at 10:53, Ivan Pepelnjak wrote: >> I think load balancers should be included; I know some universities who >> did not take part in W6D not because their web servers couldn't be made v6 >> ready, but because their load balancers could not. > > ... and some of us had to deploy NAT-PT on an obsolete router just to make 6-to-4 transition before hitting the 6-unaware LBs. Nasty. Well, if that was your option, maybe better to not take part. Though I hear a lot of sites did this. >> Firewalls: >> - surprised SeND is optional > > How many people are deploying SeND? Even in DMZ? Fair point. There are other ways to deploy a DMZ to help protect against the types of attack SeND can mitigate. Tim
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]