[ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Us
us at sweet-sorrow.com
Mon Jun 20 11:52:52 CEST 2011
5:0 please! Us On 06/20/2011 11:49 AM, Ivan Pepelnjak wrote: > 4:0 for the short text. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of >> Jan Zorz >> Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 2:06 PM >> To: ipv6-wg at ripe.net >> Subject: Re: [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document... >> >> On 6/19/11 11:34 AM, Marco Hogewoning wrote: >>> On a personal note: I agree with Ole, it is redundant to split it all up >> and in the long run it could also lead to discrepancies between the two. >> Stick with referring to 6104 and be done with it. Questions or comments on >> the exact profile can be directed at the IETF, making it the same with the >> references to 3Gpp. >> Taken into account. >> >> 3:0 for short text. >> >> /jan > >
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]