[ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Isacco Fontana
isacco.fontana at trentinonetwork.it
Sun Jul 24 18:00:57 CEST 2011
I agree ... Isacco Inviato da iPad Il giorno 24/lug/2011, alle ore 16:12, Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl> ha scritto: > Hi, > >> If the equipment doesn't support IS-IS, then you can't expect it to support IS-IS MT ;) >> >> Anyway, making IS-IS mandatory makes absolutely no sense; it's rarely used in Enterprise environments. >> >> What we could do is to change the current requirement into "If the equipment supports IS-IS routing protocol, it MUST support IS-IS MT ..." (don’t cut/paste, use the wording from the document ;) > > Sounds like good advise :) > > Thanks, > > Sander >
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]