[ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ivan Pepelnjak
ip at ioshints.info
Sun Jul 24 12:32:03 CEST 2011
If the equipment doesn't support IS-IS, then you can't expect it to support IS-IS MT ;) Anyway, making IS-IS mandatory makes absolutely no sense; it's rarely used in Enterprise environments. What we could do is to change the current requirement into "If the equipment supports IS-IS routing protocol, it MUST support IS-IS MT ..." (don’t cut/paste, use the wording from the document ;) Ivan > Currently, this is mandatory only "If MPLS Traffic Engineering is used > in combination with IS-IS routing protocol" > > What percentage of equipment we exclude as routers if we make this > unconditionally mandatory? > > I know for at least Mikrotik routers are excluded, as they do not > support IS-IS at all (and they are quite used in small/medium companies > environment). > > Opinions? > > Cheers, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]