[ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ivan Pepelnjak
ipepelnjak at gmail.com
Tue Jul 19 18:45:07 CEST 2011
No, you don't. The only protocol that needs /64 is SLAAC. /64 on the connection is a __BEST PRACTICE__ (allowing CPE router to use SLAAC), no more, no less. > -----Original Message----- > From: ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of > rodolfo.garciapenas at telefonica.es > > > On 7/19/11 3:22 PM, Ivan Pepelnjak wrote: > > > Don't pull ND into this discussion. How do you make subnets smaller > > > than /64 work on Ethernet links between Cisco routers? > > > > > > SLAAC does depend on /64. > > > > Discussion was end user assignments, not r2r connection segments. > > IMHO, the remote router could be the customer xDSL router. And you need a > */64* for the link.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]