[ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrea Cima
andrea at ripe.net
Tue Jul 19 16:23:05 CEST 2011
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jan, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: > On 7/19/11 11:36 AM, Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve) wrote: >> GV> That would be perfect.. I was just reading the comments >> sequentially... and just assumed that when an ISP gets through the HD >> ratio stuff on his first /32, that he will gets the neighbor /32. In >> that case the ISP needs to make a new address plan policy, which would >> not be as clean as if he would have had a /31 to start off with. With >> the /29 there would be no issue at all on this matter. > > I suspect many LIRs got their /32 just because they could get the > allocation and in reality did not have a clue what they really need for > deployment and are now stuck with HD ratio. > > Question for RIPE-NCC staff: do we have any data or > estimation/approximation, how many LIRs wanted additional alloc because > of this reason and got it with trade? 1 LIR has been able to justify an expansion of their initial /32 (back in 2004). 15 LIRs gave back their initially requested /32 in exchange for a larger allocation. Furthermore 23 LIRs got a first allocation larger than /32. > How many are asking for it? Just a handful. > Would /29 cover majority of this "trades"? Out of the 15 cases mentioned above only 1 would have fitted in a /29. All the other allocation were much larger. > Are there any clueless LIRs, that got /32, but today with presenting > real data they would get more than /29? We can not see how many LIRs would now get a larger allocation as it depends on data that we do not have (assignment size - /48 or /64?, number of customers, growth etc). However when we receive a /32 allocation request, and it's clear that the LIR will need more than a /32 based on the information they provide, we advise the LIR about the fact that the requested amount may not be covering their current needs. I hope this helps Best regards Andrea Cima RIPE NCC > We need some statistics here, if possible. > > Cheers, Jan > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAk4lk0kACgkQXOgsmPkFrjPGXgCfdCviOSBkfjxWV/lFZYKpjDlf R2QAoJLHylcsqAgKqNV7EVS/TwacKlI9 =Mu0L -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]