[ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Tue Jul 19 14:17:19 CEST 2011
On 7/19/11 1:44 PM, Ahmed Abu-Abed wrote: > I am not proposing a change with respect to existing RFCs; we must to > live with existing /64 subnets as a minimum allocation. > > My comments apply for future networks beyond the current 2000::/3 range > used by all RIRs. Beyond this range all options are still open. I don't think so. IPv6 as protocol applies over all ::/0, not only 2000::/3 Why do you think ND and SLAAC would behave differently in 4000::/3 ? Cheers, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]