[ipv6-wg] Re: 2010-06 is going to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: 2010-06 is going to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: 2010-06 is going to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kostas Zorbadelos
kzorba at otenet.gr
Thu Jan 27 10:38:46 CET 2011
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 09:36:55 pm Daniel Roesen wrote: <snip> ... > I oppose on grounds of paragraph 2 of "Arguments Opposing the Proposal". > > The only one who needs the assignment size is RIPE NCC when evaluating > new allocation requests or in audit. ... </snip> I am sure that RIPE NCC is not the only interested party for the publication of an assignment-size attribute. I think the advantages clearly outweigh the disadvantages here. I support this proposal. Regards, Kostas
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: 2010-06 is going to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: 2010-06 is going to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]