[ipv6-wg] "Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment" comment
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] "Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment" comment
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] "Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment" comment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Sun Jan 9 15:33:24 CET 2011
----- Original message ----- > It's probably best to start from the existing "Basic Requirements for > IPv6 Customer Edge Routers" draft. You might also want to check whether > a CPE-focused RIPE document wouldn't reinvent the wheel. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-09 > > Ivan Ivan, hi. Ole already proposed this and I'm also looking into BBF TR124r2 as possible reference. /Jan > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf > > Of Jan Zorz @ go6.si > > Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 1:30 PM > > To: Ahmed Abu-Abed; RIPE IPv6 > > Subject: Re: [ipv6-wg] "Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment" comment > > > > > > ----- Original message ----- > > > My suggestion was to develop a best practice for consumer CPE > > > specifications based on existing IETF standards/drafts. > > > > > > Regards, > > > -Ahmed > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > Thank you for suggestion. Mandatory part should not be a big challenge, > > but optional section might be tricky... > > > > We'll try to compile first beta draft text for the CPE and see if > > community likes it and what we need to change/add. > > > > best, Jan Zorz > > > > > > > > > > > From: Marco Hogewoning > > > Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 1:22 PM > > > To: Ahmed Abu-Abed > > > Cc: kzorba at otenet.gr ; ipv6-wg at ripe.net > > > Subject: Re: [ipv6-wg] "Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment" > > > comment > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9 jan 2011, at 05:40, Ahmed Abu-Abed wrote: > > > > > > > Good point, and having a Consumer CPE spec as a RIPE standard would > > > > help for last mile access requirements. RIPE-501 only aimed for > > > > government and enterprise deployments. > > > > > > My personal preference would be to keep pointing to the work done in > > > the IETF. The problem with standards is, there usually are too many. > > > Adding another one will only lead to more confusion, let alone the > > > time it will take to get consensus. > > > > > > Grtx, > > > > > > MarcoH > > > > > > -- > > > "Good tests kill flawed theories; we remain alive to guess again" >
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] "Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment" comment
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] "Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment" comment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]